<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Doncaster Wedding Photographer  I  Wedding PhotograYorkshire Portraits Doncaster Photography I Contemporary &#38; Artistic Wedding &#38; Portraits , Yorkshire &#38; the UK &#187; prime lens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yorkshireportraitsblog.com/tag/prime-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yorkshireportraitsblog.com</link>
	<description>Doncaster Wedding Photographer Yorkshire Portraits  I  Contemporary Wedding  Photography in Doncaster, Yorkshire &#38; the UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:06:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Best £100 you&#8217;ll ever spend! {if you are a photography geek that is!}</title>
		<link>http://www.yorkshireportraitsblog.com/2010/03/20/best-lens-for-wedding-photography/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yorkshireportraitsblog.com/2010/03/20/best-lens-for-wedding-photography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Shillitoe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8. Personal Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1. Wedding Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime lens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yorkshireportraitsblog.com/?p=840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2 questions that I get asked at least once a week, are &#8216;what camera should I buy, and what lens do you use?&#8217; You only have to look in any of the numerous photography publications out there, to see that the choice can often be bewildering to the first time buyer. Compact, bridge Camera or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 questions that I get asked at least once a week, are &#8216;<em>what camera should I buy, and what lens do you use</em>?&#8217;</p>
<p>You only have to look in any of the numerous photography publications out there, to see that the choice can often be bewildering to the first time buyer. Compact, bridge Camera or SLR? Canon, Nikon, Pentax, Olympus, Panasonic or Sony? 8MP or 30MP? I could go on, but I think you get the picture. Neither bridge cameras or high end compacts can match the SLR in terms of flexibility and image quality. For a wedding or portrait photographer, quality should be the be all and end all.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try and tackle the mega-pixel question first. It&#8217;s believed by many, that the higher the mega-pixel, the better the camera.  If you pop into your local electrical store and ask them which camera they recommend, more likely than not, they&#8217;ll try and sell you what ever they have on offer/a camera that&#8217;s about to be discontinued/ or one that they have too many left in stock and can&#8217;t shift. Although there are exceptions, you will probably know as much about photography as they do! Mega-pixels are, in my opinion, the last thing that you should be considering. My 6 year old Nikon D70 SLR only has 6mp, but the quality of the images that it produces still knocks the socks off of any 14+MP compact. I havent used it in over 4 years, but I&#8217;d turn to that rather than a 2010 high end compact every time, if the need ever arose. It all comes down to the quality of the glass on the front of the camera which captures the image.</p>
<p>This brings me onto probably the best bargain that anybody interested in progressing their photography should invest in &#8211; the humble 50mm prime  lens. If you go down the SLR route, this should be your first port of call. It will blow the socks off the kit lens that comes with the camera. The f1.8 lens will set you back around £100. Until the pound began it&#8217;s never ending downward spiral, you could have bagged one for around £65. £100, however, still represents a bargain in my eyes.  Faster  1.4 and f 1.2 pro- level variants are also available , however, these cost considerably more. The 50mm doubles up as fantastic portrait lens along with being a great everyday lenses.</p>
<p>The greatest thing about this lens is that f/1.8 (or better still, f1.4 if your budget allows). That super-low number means two things that are important in a practical way:</p>
<p>1) You have a very shallow Depth of Field (DOF), which means that your subject will be in sharp focus and everything else will be deliciously out of focus.<br />
2) You can shoot in very low light conditions without a flash, giving your photos a very natural look.</p>
<p>My Nikon prime lenses, the 35 1.4 50mm 1.4 and 85mm 1.4 are 3 pieces of glass that i couldn&#8217;t live without (or at least make a living without!)</p>
<p>Using a zoom lens is great, however, they can sometimes make a photographer lazy &#8211; a prime lens, on the other hand, makes you think more about your composition. Traditionally, prime lenses have  been optically superior to zoom lenses. They are also lighter to walk around with, and due to their wide mazimum apertures, allow  in far more light which allows you to carry on shooting without resorting to flash &#8211; well after zoom lens have given up the ghost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yorkshireportraitsblog.com/2010/03/20/best-lens-for-wedding-photography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

